The Basics Of Regulation D Private Placement Offerings

If you’re a private company, how can you sell your securities to VCs or angel investors without going public or registering your securities with the SEC?  Private companies, whether startups or more established companies, can offer and sell their securities through a private placement.  Companies can use one of the registration exemptions under Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933 to undertake a private placement.

Regulation D’s three exemptions are found in Rules 504, 505, and 506.

The Rule 504 Exemption

Rule 504 applies to transactions consisting of no more than $1 million of securities sales in any twelve-month period.  Rule 504 does not limit the number of investors and allows commissions to be paid.  The exemption does not permit issuers to broadly solicit or advertise their securities to the public.  Purchasers may not resell these “restricted” securities without registering them or using an exemption.  Under certain circumstances, securities that are not restricted may be resold.  Because of these scant federal rules, securities transactions of this size fall under the purview of state Blue Sky laws.

The Rule 505 Exemption And Accredited Investors (Rule 501)

Rule 505 provides a registration exemption for securities sales that meet the following four conditions:

  1. The company may sell no more than $5 million of its securities in any twelve-month period.
  2. The company may sell to as many “accredited investors” as it wants to and up to 35 other persons who do not meet the sophistication or asset and income standards.
  3. The company must tell purchasers that the securities are “restricted,” and cannot be resold for six months without registering the securities.
  4. The company cannot sell the securities through general solicitation or advertising to the public.

The company must provide non-accredited investors with disclosure documents that are similar to those given in a registered offering.  Particularly noteworthy is the requirement that an independent public auditor must certify the financial statements.  Further, any information given to accredited investors must also be given to non-accredited investors.

Under Rule 501, an accredited investor is a natural person:

  • whose net worth, or net worth with the person’s spouse, is greater than $1 million at the time of purchase (where net worth includes value of primary residence)
  • with income exceeding $200,000 in each of the past two years, or joint income with the person’s spouse greater than $300,000 for the past two years and a reasonable expectation of having the same income level in the current year; or
  • a trust with assets greater than $5 million, which was not established to obtain the securities offered, whose purchases a sophisticated person makes.

Examples of other accredited investors include banks, insurance companies, and employee benefit plans.

The Rule 506 Exemption

Rule 506 does not impose a dollar limit on the offering.  Again, the company cannot solicit or advertise to the offering to the public.  The financial statement requirements mirror those of Rule 505.  As with Rule 505, the company must give accredited and non-accredited investors the same information.  The purchasers receive “restricted” securities.  This Section 4(2) safe harbor is satisfied if the following additional criteria are met:

  • The company can sell the securities to an unlimited number of accredited investors and up to 35 other purchasers.  In contrast to Rule 505, the other investors must all be sophisticated — that is, possess sufficient knowledge and background to make a competent investment decision.
  • The company must be available to answer questions from potential investors.

Further Requirements

The sale of securities under a Regulation D exemption are subject to a few additional requirements.  First, the antifraud provisions of the securities laws apply to private placements.  The company must disclose relevant information to potential investors.  Second, Rule 503 provides that the issuer must file Form D within 15 days after the first sale of securities.  Form D is a notice requirement with no other substantive reporting requirement.

Conclusion

To summarize, Regulation D poses considerable requirements upon exempt offerings.  Yet, a private company that does not want to go public or register its securities has a strong incentive to satisfy the standards for a private placement under Regulation D.

If you are contemplating a Regulation D private placement offering, you should be aware that the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act will affect such offerings.  A future post will cover the implications of Dodd-Frank for Regulation D offerings.

Douglas Y. Park

Twitter: @DougYPark

If you enjoyed this post, please subscribe to the blog by RSS feed or email.  You can find the subscription option on the sidebar to the immediate right.  Also, click the Facebook Like button below and Like the DYP Advisors Facebook page using the option on the far right sidebar.

Ebook Sales Soar For Amazon And Apple As Competition Grows

Ebooks are outselling print books on Amazon.  During the second quarter of 2010, Amazon sold 143 ebooks for every 100 print books.  The gap between ebook and print book sales is widening.  In June 2010, Amazon sold 180 ebooks for every 100 hardcover books.

While Amazon’s Kindle occupies the dominant position in the ebook market, it faces stiff competition.  The Apple iPad is gaining ground quickly on Amazon, with the iPad capturing 22 percent of the ebook market in its first 60 days.  However, since many readers want a dedicated e-reader in addition to the iPad, the Kindle and iPad may be complements rather than competitors.  Amazon’s recent price cut on the Kindle has spurred sales of the device.  More Kindles equals more ebook sales.

But new entrants are entering the ebook business.  For example, Border’s just opened a 1.5 million volume ebook store and released e-reader applications for Blackberry and Android phones. Only Amazon has more ebook titles.

Analyzing Competition In The Ebook Market

How will competition affect the industry players?  The good news for ebook competitors is that the market will continue to grow.  Goldman Sachs recently forecast that sales of ebooks in the U.S. will increase 47 percent each year until 201o, with ebook sales reaching $3.2 billion by 2015.

According to this forecast, ebooks will constitute 12.8 percent of all book sales by 2015.  Ebooks currently make up three percent of total sales. Goldman expects print book sales to fall one percent each year through 2015.

Despite intensifying competition, the ebooks market will remain an attractive market.  Although profit margins on the ereaders are low, margins on the ebooks currently run over 20 percent.  For this reason, we can expect to see more players enter the ebook market.  The important point is potential industry earnings for the ebook market will grow.

As the number of incumbents increases, there will be a shakeout as device features, convergence around a few ebook formats, and ebook library size separate the winners from the rest of the pack.  One question is when will the shakeout begin?  With Amazon cutting the price on the Kindle and Barnes and Noble doing the same for the Nook, I would expect a shakeout in no earlier than one year, but probably less than two.

Aside from continued growth, the ebook market is full of uncertainties.  That makes the market one where competitive strategy will matter, and thus a market to watch.

What do you think will be the key determinants of competitive success in the ebook market?  And who do you think will have the largest market share one year from now? Two years from now?

Douglas Y. Park

Twitter: @DougYPark

If you enjoyed this post, please subscribe to the blog by RSS feed or email.  You can find the subscription option on the sidebar to the immediate right.  Also, click the Facebook Like button below and Like the DYP Advisors Facebook page using the option on the far right sidebar.

Boku Expanding From Mobile Payments For Virtual Goods To Real World Transactions

Boku, a startup that makes mobile payments for virtual goods easier, is moving into the real world.  That is, Boku has its sights on online transactions for concrete goods.

The markets for both mobile payments and virtual goods are huge.  Mobile payments will reach $633 billion by 2014In 2010, the U.S. market for virtual goods will be nearly $1.6 billion.

Considering that the virtual payment space will continue to grow, why is Boku expanding from payments to virtual goods to real world goods?  Zong and gWallet continue to go strong in facilitating payments for virtual goods.  Zong specializes in mobile payments for virtual goods and social networks, while gWallet focuses on promoting its own virtual currency platform for social media.

Boku sees an opportunity to capitalize on declining processing fees for mobile transactions.  While transaction fees for mobile payments have traditionally been around 30 to 40%, those rates are coming down to 10%.  At this lower rate mobile payments for tangible goods become more economically viable for payments providers.

Zong, one of Boku’s competitors, also believes that lower transaction fees will spur more mobile payments.  Hill Ferguson, vice president of product and marketing at Zong, explains the importance of lower carrier fees for mobile payments:

We expect mobile carriers in the United States to begin lowering their fees, which will certainly increase demand for bill-to-carrier payments online.  Payments is a scale game, so we expect some industry consolidation as players without scale get acquired or go out of business.

Discussion

As more companies move into the mobile payments space, competition may lead to consolidation, though not in the near future.  Since consolidation will not happen immediately, this raises interesting questions about strategy and competition in mobile payments:

  1. How big is big enough to obtain the benefits of scale?
  2. Will there be a race to become the biggest, not just big?
  3. How effectively can mergers or acquisitions provide scale benefits in the face of different business models and technologies?
  4. Will scale have a greater effect on competitive outcomes than factors such as customer user interface design, security, and specialization?

For now, it is not clear that scale is the only, or most relevant, determinant of success.  Mobile payments companies should consider how they can prosper without being the biggest.

Douglas Y. Park

Twitter: @DougYPark

If you enjoyed this post, please subscribe to the blog by RSS feed or email.  You can find the subscription option on the sidebar to the immediate right.  Also, click the Facebook Like button below and Like the DYP Advisors Facebook page using the option on the far right sidebar.

Three Questions To Ask Your Lawyer About Business Strategy

Does your lawyer understand your company's business strategy?  Does your lawyer need to understand your strategy? These may seem like unusual questions, but they are critical to your business's success.  Put simply, your business lawyer should understand your strategy. Why?  Most importantly, your ...

Read the full article »

Thoughts on Michael Porter’s How Business Can Regain Legitimacy

The legitimacy of business, the trust that people place in business, is at a low point.  Business legitimacy is a matter of strategy, leadership, and responsible corporate behavior.  Starting with that premise, Michael Porter, the dean of competitive strategy, argues that business must ...

Read the full article »

Five Experts On Game Mechanics, Social Games, And Behavioral Economics

Five experts recently gave their thoughts on how game mechanics, social games, and behavioral economics inform gaming.  Gabe Zichermann, co-founder and CEO of BeamMe Live, offered a provocative thought to kick off the discussion: I thought there was more to games than fun. Then I ...

Read the full article »

Two Differences In How Angel Investors And Venture Capitalists Invest

With the venture capital industry shrinking, many entrepreneurs have started looking to angel investors for funding.   There are two main differences in the funding practices of VCs and angels: (1) Stage of investment, and (2) Size of investment.  How do these differences affect your ...

Read the full article »

The Number One Concern Of IPO Companies: Corporate Governance

What do private companies about to do an IPO worry about most?  Corporate governance.  That's right -- corporate governance, according to recent polls conducted by KPMG.  64 percent of executives named corporate governance as one of their top three concerns about going public. Recent events demonstrate that corporate governance is an important ...

Read the full article »

Entrepreneurs: Does Your Attorney Need To Understand Your Business?

Does your attorney need to understand your business?  And if your business lawyer does not have a strong grasp of your business, does it matter?  The answers matter for entrepreneurs and for managers of established companies. Some lawyers will say that they do not ...

Read the full article »

Angel Investors: Give Them Common or Preferred Stock?

Congratulations.  You have convinced several angel investors to fund your startup.  Do the angels get common stock or preferred stock?  What's the difference between common and preferred stock?  Why does it matter?  This deal term has implications for future funding rounds and your relationship ...

Read the full article »