
Source: CBS News
CEO compensation once again reared its head in the corporate governance debate. This time, corporate governance and CEO compensation collided over Abercrombie & Fitch CEO's use of the company's private jet.
Troubled clothing maker Abercrombie & Fitch paid CEO Mike Jeffries $4 million to end his jet perk. Jeffries can no longer use the Abercrombie & Fitch (NYSE: ANF) company jet for personal use. Abercrombie reported the $4 million lump sum buy out in its 8-K filing with the SEC on April 12, 2010.
Sean Gregory, the reporter who wrote the TIME magazine article on the Abercrombie CEO jet perk, interviewed me for my thoughts on this corporate governance matter:
Abercrombie's move has corporate governance experts shaking their heads. ... And after so many missteps, you can't help but wonder if Abercrombie will ever get [common sense] back. "I just thought, what are they thinking? Really?" says Douglas Park, a Silicon Valley-based consultant. "Customers aren't happy with them right now. Investors aren't happy. You have to wonder what is going through their minds."
Yes, Mr. Gregory accurately quoted me. That quote is only a snippet from our conversation. I also gave my thoughts on:
1. Why investors care about CEO compensation packages and perks.
2. Why consumers care.
Abercrombie has received a lot of negative publicity over its alleged discriminatory hiring practices against racial minorities, women, and religious minorities and discriminatory treatment of a customer with autism. In 2004, Abercrombie settled for $50 million a lawsuit that alleged the company systematically discriminated against minorities and women in its hiring.
3. Why boards of directors continue to make CEO compensation decisions that damage their company's reputation with investors and consumers.
I wrote about this issue in a post concerning new SEC rules regarding the disclosure of compensation packages. In that post, I contended that reputation risk is one factor boards of directors should consider in deciding what to disclose in SEC filings about the riskiness of their compensation packages. The Abercrombie case presented a strange twist on compensation: Abercrombie paid the CEO to give up a perk, when the CEO should have reimbursed the company for his use of the company jet for personal purposes.
Conclusion
However, making decisions that reflect common sense should not be difficult. Sometimes it takes an outsider's perspective to help the directors understand how their decisions will affect the company's reputation with investors and customers.
Twitter: @DougYPark
If you enjoyed this post, please subscribe to the blog by RSS feed or email. You can find the subscription option on the sidebar to the immediate right. Also, click the Facebook Like button below and Like the DYP Advisors Facebook page.



